Skip to content

Document that parsed_block is not defined in codebase#27

Draft
Copilot wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
copilot/search-parsed-block-definition
Draft

Document that parsed_block is not defined in codebase#27
Copilot wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
copilot/search-parsed-block-definition

Conversation

Copy link

Copilot AI commented Dec 18, 2025

The question "where is parsed_block defined" implies an expectation that this variable exists in the codebase. It does not.

Search Results

  • No matches for parsed_block across all Ruby files, ERB templates, and configuration files
  • No matches for parse.*block patterns
  • Only unrelated "block" references found (CSS display: block, database schema)

Existing Parse Operations

The codebase contains unrelated parsing:

  • JSON.parse() and URI.parse() in url_shortener_service.rb
  • Date.parse() in opportunities_controller.rb

Documentation Added

Created PARSED_BLOCK_INVESTIGATION.md documenting:

  • Complete search methodology and results
  • All existing parse-related code
  • Potential reasons for the question (error message, external reference, planned feature)
  • Implementation guidance if needed

Conclusion: parsed_block is undefined in this repository.

Original prompt

where is parsed_block defined


💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

Copilot AI self-assigned this Dec 18, 2025
Co-authored-by: ntxtthomas <11153830+ntxtthomas@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Investigate where parsed_block is defined Document that parsed_block is not defined in codebase Dec 18, 2025
Copilot AI requested a review from ntxtthomas December 18, 2025 22:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants