BndtoolsRuntimeController: added support to utilize existing OSGi Http Service instead of integrated HTTP server.

[kgilmer]

Hi Neil, I'm considering moving from our BUG-specific SDK/BUG WS API to BndtoolsRuntimeController simply because it's clean and a nice isolation of the WS APIs. I've added support to use an HTTP Service rather than NanoServer. I've only tested doGet() but the code is there for all supported methods.

I saw in your docs that you had this as an unimplemented feature, so perhaps you are interested in pulling this...

cheers
ken

[njbartlett]

Hi Ken,

This looks great and I will definitely look at pulling it later on
(bit busy right now…).

I'm not doing very much myself with the runtime controller so if you
wanted to take it over as the primary maintainer I would be fine with
that.

Cheers,
Neil

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:26 AM, kgilmer
reply@reply.github.com
wrote:

Hi Neil, I'm considering moving from our BUG-specific SDK/BUG WS API to BndtoolsRuntimeController simply because it's clean and a nice isolation of the WS APIs.  I've added support to use an HTTP Service rather than NanoServer.  I've only tested doGet() but the code is there for all supported methods.

I saw in your docs that you had this as an unimplemented feature, so perhaps you are interested in pulling this...

cheers
ken

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#1