1.1.0

• Added failsafe for bad config.plist (NOT perfect, I think-)
• Show any errors in form of warning after the entire thing ends
• Remove version assumption
• Add invalid MATs detection
• Made the thing easier to run by modifying the require path

AAAA 1.0.0 binary Windows edition

How to run:

1. Grab OCConfigReader.exe, lua54.dll and preb-ocat.plist
2. Place them at one folder(downloads is fine)
3. Run OCConfigReader.exe preb-ocat.plist
4. Profit!

For macOS/OS X/Linux/etc users - read the readme! This version is outdated!

1.0.2

BINARY BUILD IS ONLY FOR 1.0.0!!

• Fixed a crash that 100% happens when running on the OCCR directory

1,0,1

BINARY BUILD IS ONLY AVAILABLE FOR 1.0.0!!!

• actual import logic(no shell script fucky wucky)
• others
• ACPI > Patch

1.0.0

Initial release. Not much has been edited in a while. Binary isn't and never will be available.

1.0.0 (binary)

Run instruction:

OCConfigReader.exe preb-ocat.plist

THIS IS THE ONE AND ONLY BINARY BUILD!! ANY FURTHER BUILDS WILL DISTRIBUTED AS A CODE!!!

Okay, first of all, it’s GNU/Linux, not “Linux.” You keep saying “Linux” like it’s some magic OS that fell from the sky, when in reality it’s just the kernel. The real operating system—the one that gives you your shells, your coreutils, your compilers, your sanity—is the GNU system. By not calling it GNU/Linux, you’re erasing the work of decades of free software pioneers who fought tooth and nail so you could sit there whining about things not being shiny enough. You sound like the kind of person who installs Arch and then blogs about how hard it is to use a terminal. News flash: it’s not hard—you’re just lazy. Second, the whole “Linux isn’t built for people” line? Give me a break. You want an OS that’s “built for people”? What people? Consumers? Passive clickers? People who treat a computer like a Netflix vending machine? GNU/Linux isn’t built for users the way Apple or Microsoft defines users—as data sources for ads, or potential subscribers to whatever crapware-as-a-service model they’re shoving this fiscal quarter. GNU/Linux is built for users in the sense of users who use their brains. If you're allergic to learning, maybe this ecosystem isn’t for you—and that’s fine, just stop trying to dumb it down for the rest of us. You’re mad because you don’t “feel welcomed”? Look, freedom isn’t about making you feel hugged while your system silently phones home and installs DRM. GNU/Linux is about you owning your machine. It’s about writing a shell script to replace some bloated GUI monstrosity because you can. It’s about reading the manual and understanding your stack, not begging for some dev to “just make it work like macOS.” You’re not being excluded—you’re being challenged. If you don't like that, maybe stick to using ChromeOS with your Google account tethered to every bodily function. And don’t think I didn’t notice you never once mentioned freedom in your post. Not even once. Not a single nod to software freedom, user control, or the social contract behind all this code. That tells me everything I need to know. You think this is about convenience, when it’s really about liberation. This isn’t about your fonts not rendering or your Wi-Fi card needing a firmware blob. This is about you refusing to confront the responsibilities of being in control. You want GNU/Linux to “love you back”? That’s not how this works. GNU/Linux isn’t Trump, trying to flatter you while stabbing you in the back. It’s not some product that wants to manipulate your emotions to get you to upgrade. It’s a tool, and it assumes you’re smart enough to wield it. If you want love, get a dog. If you want freedom, open a terminal.