Skip to content

Анализ текущей реализации MetaMode и исправления#265

Merged
netkeep80 merged 3 commits intonetkeep80:mainfrom
konard:issue-264-285bb69fba25
Feb 6, 2026
Merged

Анализ текущей реализации MetaMode и исправления#265
netkeep80 merged 3 commits intonetkeep80:mainfrom
konard:issue-264-285bb69fba25

Conversation

@konard
Copy link
Contributor

@konard konard commented Feb 6, 2026

Summary

  • Comprehensive analysis of the current MetaMode implementation identifying 6 categories of issues
  • Fixed 9 missing file registrations in metamode.json descriptors
  • Made metamode field optional in DirectoryDescriptor schema (path auto-inferred as {dirname}/metamode.json)
  • Updated all build tools (validator, Vite plugin, AI optimizer) to support path auto-inference
  • Clarified spec to distinguish standard vs compact format, fixed broken converter reference
  • Added shared types module for future code deduplication

Key Findings (docs/metamode-analysis.md)

  1. All 32 metamode.json files use the standard format — spec describes compact format as goal but it's actually the compiled AI output, not storage format
  2. metamode field was required but shouldn't be — spec says paths auto-infer, schema contradicted this
  3. 9 files were not registered in their respective metamode.json (database, LLM integration, inline extractor tests, compact schema)
  4. Referenced converter (scripts/metamode-converter.ts) didn't exist — fixed spec to reference actual tools
  5. Code duplication across 3 scripts — created shared module for gradual migration
  6. AI optimization saves ~14% tokens, not the 30-40% claimed in spec (descriptions already compact)

Test plan

  • All 3585 tests pass
  • npm run metamode:validate — 0 errors
  • npm run lint — 0 new errors (33 pre-existing warnings)
  • npm run typecheck — passes
  • npm run format:check — passes
  • npm run metamode:ai:analyze — works correctly

Fixes #264

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

konard and others added 2 commits February 6, 2026 10:51
Adding CLAUDE.md with task information for AI processing.
This file will be removed when the task is complete.

Issue: netkeep80#264
- Add analysis document (docs/metamode-analysis.md) with findings and improvement plan
- Register 9 missing files in metamode.json descriptors (database, LLM integration, inline extractor tests, compact schema, issue-attachments)
- Make 'metamode' field optional in DirectoryDescriptor schema (auto-inferred as {dirname}/metamode.json)
- Update validator, Vite plugin, and AI optimizer to support path auto-inference
- Clarify spec (metamode.md): distinguish standard vs compact format, fix converter reference
- Add shared types module (scripts/metamode-shared.ts) for future deduplication

Fixes netkeep80#264

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@konard konard changed the title [WIP] Анализ текущей реализации MetaMode и планирование доработок Анализ текущей реализации MetaMode и исправления Feb 6, 2026
@konard konard marked this pull request as ready for review February 6, 2026 10:07
@konard
Copy link
Contributor Author

konard commented Feb 6, 2026

🤖 Solution Draft Log

This log file contains the complete execution trace of the AI solution draft process.

💰 Cost estimation:

  • Public pricing estimate: $11.027023 USD
  • Calculated by Anthropic: $7.305451 USD
  • Difference: $-3.721572 (-33.75%)
    📎 Log file uploaded as Gist (2011KB)
    🔗 View complete solution draft log

Now working session is ended, feel free to review and add any feedback on the solution draft.

@netkeep80 netkeep80 merged commit db989fc into netkeep80:main Feb 6, 2026
7 checks passed
konard added a commit to link-assistant/hive-mind that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2026
Deep analysis of why --auto-merge didn't work for PRs ideav/crm#233
and netkeep80/isocubic#265. Root cause: the solver operates in fork
mode (read-only access) but gh pr merge requires write access to the
target repository.

Includes timeline reconstruction, evidence data, and proposed solutions.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Анализ текущей реализации MetaMode и планирование доработок

2 participants