Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade ipfs-http-client from 56.0.1 to 58.0.0#6

Open
nek0ill wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
snyk-fix-a610b3d9916bddad724146cc5a746217
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade ipfs-http-client from 56.0.1 to 58.0.0#6
nek0ill wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
snyk-fix-a610b3d9916bddad724146cc5a746217

Conversation

@nek0ill
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@nek0ill nek0ill commented Jul 6, 2023

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `npm` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • package.json
    • package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
high severity 823/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 8.6
Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-PROTOBUFJS-5756498
Yes Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Prototype Pollution

@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel Bot commented Jul 6, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
glamdring ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jul 6, 2023 2:51pm
yourjustice ❌ Failed (Inspect) Jul 6, 2023 2:51pm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants