Skip to content

Add support for Matomo >= 4.0.0 (#2) #12

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
jlebonzec wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Add support for Matomo >= 4.0.0 (#2) #12

jlebonzec wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@jlebonzec
Copy link
Contributor

@jlebonzec jlebonzec commented Mar 10, 2022

  • Define theme before anything else
  • Change the way we detect database is working
  • Add creation of security files, to comply with diagnostic reports
  • Add the option to define a salt manually
    • This is required when having multiple workers, otherwise logging in will simply be impossible
  • Remove calls to console core:update
    • When updating an existing installation, we most likely want to run and supervise migration ourselves

@jlebonzec
Add support for Matomo >= 4.0.0 (#2)
85b13e8 
- Define theme before anything else
- Change the way we detect database is working
- Add creation of security files, to comply with diagnostic reports
- Add the option to define a salt manually
  - This is required when having multiple workers, otherwise logging in will simply be impossible
- Remove calls to `console core:update`
  - When updating an existing installation, we most likely want to run and supervise migration ourselves
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

1 more reviewer

@CaioSilvaDti CaioSilvaDti CaioSilvaDti approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@jlebonzec @CaioSilvaDti