add 10% chance to execute ls

[red-socks294]

because of the StackExchange thread "Does sl ever show the current directory?"

[Julien-Leos]

I approve. Now please add 1% chance on ls to execute sl.

[red-socks294]

Okay... but i'll first attempt to check if sl is indeed installed on the system

[tralph3]

I would suggest running ls and letting the shell interpret it, that way aliases should be respected.

[red-socks294]

I will do that when I get to my PC.

[okalachev]

This would ruin the joke:

As far as I know, the only condition under which sl shows the current directory is when you mistype it as ls.

So I'm against.

[red-socks294]

I would suggest running ls and letting the shell interpret it, that way aliases should be respected.

This has been added.