-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Initial modl-admin release #6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR implements the initial release of modl-admin with significant infrastructure changes including package migration, Discord webhook notifications, server monitoring, and enhanced deployment workflows.
- Updates package references from local
modl-shared-webto published@modl-gg/shared-webnpm package - Implements Discord webhook service for error notifications and rate limit monitoring
- Adds server provisioning monitoring with automated failure notifications
- Enhances CI/CD workflows with improved error handling and GitHub Packages authentication
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 32 out of 34 changed files in this pull request and generated 5 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| shared/types.ts | Package import update to published npm package |
| server/services/ServerProvisioningMonitor.ts | New service for monitoring failed server provisioning |
| server/services/DiscordWebhookService.ts | New Discord webhook notification system |
| server/middleware/rateLimitMiddleware.ts | Centralized rate limiting with Discord notifications |
| server/db/connectionManager.ts | New MongoDB connection manager for better timeout handling |
| package.json | Package dependencies update and license change |
| .github/workflows/* | Enhanced deployment workflows with better error handling |
| client/src/**/*.tsx | Package import updates across client components |
Files not reviewed (1)
- client/package-lock.json: Language not supported
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private async sendFailureNotification(server: any) { |
Copilot
AI
Aug 7, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The parameter type 'any' should be replaced with a specific interface or type to ensure type safety and better API design.
| private async sendFailureNotification(server: any) { | |
| private async sendFailureNotification(server: IModlServer) { |
| const serverData = server as any; // Type assertion to access properties | ||
| await discordWebhookService.sendServerProvisioningFailure( | ||
| server._id.toString(), | ||
| serverData.name || 'Unnamed Server', | ||
| 'Server provisioning has been in failed state for over 10 minutes', | ||
| { | ||
| 'Email': serverData.email || 'N/A', | ||
| 'Plan': serverData.plan || 'N/A', |
Copilot
AI
Aug 7, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Type assertion to 'any' defeats TypeScript's type safety. Consider defining a proper interface for server data or using the existing IModlServer type.
| const serverData = server as any; // Type assertion to access properties | |
| await discordWebhookService.sendServerProvisioningFailure( | |
| server._id.toString(), | |
| serverData.name || 'Unnamed Server', | |
| 'Server provisioning has been in failed state for over 10 minutes', | |
| { | |
| 'Email': serverData.email || 'N/A', | |
| 'Plan': serverData.plan || 'N/A', | |
| await discordWebhookService.sendServerProvisioningFailure( | |
| server._id.toString(), | |
| server.name || 'Unnamed Server', | |
| 'Server provisioning has been in failed state for over 10 minutes', | |
| { | |
| 'Email': server.email || 'N/A', | |
| 'Plan': server.plan || 'N/A', |
| const serverData = server as any; // Type assertion to access properties | ||
| discordWebhookService.sendServerProvisioningFailure( | ||
| server._id.toString(), | ||
| serverData.name || 'Unnamed Server', | ||
| 'Server suspended by admin bulk action', | ||
| { | ||
| 'Email': serverData.email || 'N/A', | ||
| 'Plan': serverData.plan || 'N/A', |
Copilot
AI
Aug 7, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Type assertion to 'any' defeats TypeScript's type safety. The server object should already have the correct type from the ModlServerModel query.
| const serverData = server as any; // Type assertion to access properties | |
| discordWebhookService.sendServerProvisioningFailure( | |
| server._id.toString(), | |
| serverData.name || 'Unnamed Server', | |
| 'Server suspended by admin bulk action', | |
| { | |
| 'Email': serverData.email || 'N/A', | |
| 'Plan': serverData.plan || 'N/A', | |
| discordWebhookService.sendServerProvisioningFailure( | |
| server._id.toString(), | |
| server.name || 'Unnamed Server', | |
| 'Server suspended by admin bulk action', | |
| { | |
| 'Email': server.email || 'N/A', | |
| 'Plan': server.plan || 'N/A', |
| options?: CustomRateLimitOptions | ||
| ): RateLimitRequestHandler { | ||
| const notificationThreshold = options?.notificationThreshold || max; | ||
| const hitCounts = new Map<string, number>(); |
Copilot
AI
Aug 7, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The hitCounts Map will grow indefinitely and cause memory leaks. Consider implementing a cleanup mechanism or using a time-based cache with TTL.
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Reset hit count after window expires | ||
| setTimeout(() => { |
Copilot
AI
Aug 7, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Creating individual setTimeout calls for each rate limit hit is inefficient and can lead to performance issues under high load. Consider using a single cleanup interval or a more efficient cache invalidation strategy.
No description provided.