Skip to content

[bugfix] fix grpo loss#93

Merged
hjh0119 merged 1 commit intomodelscope:mainfrom
hjh0119:fix-grpo
Mar 2, 2026
Merged

[bugfix] fix grpo loss#93
hjh0119 merged 1 commit intomodelscope:mainfrom
hjh0119:fix-grpo

Conversation

@hjh0119
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@hjh0119 hjh0119 commented Mar 2, 2026

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a bug in the GRPO loss calculation by reordering the initialization of the loss_mask. This ensures that the mask is consistently available for subsequent operations, regardless of whether logps needs to be computed from logits or is directly provided, thereby enhancing the robustness of the loss function.

Highlights

  • GRPO Loss Calculation: Corrected the order of loss_mask initialization in the GRPO loss function to ensure it is always defined before use, preventing potential errors when logps is already available.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog
  • src/twinkle/loss/grpo.py
    • Moved the loss_mask initialization to ensure it's always defined.
Activity
  • No specific activity found in the provided context.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request fixes a bug in the GRPOLoss calculation where loss_mask was not defined in all code paths, which would cause a runtime error. The fix correctly moves the loss_mask calculation to ensure it's always initialized. I've suggested a small improvement to reduce code duplication by reusing an existing helper method, which will improve long-term maintainability.

@hjh0119 hjh0119 merged commit 295a2be into modelscope:main Mar 2, 2026
1 of 3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants