Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @kevssim, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces support for Expert FSDP (Fully Sharded Data Parallel) within the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request introduces support for ep_fsdp (Expert FSDP Parallel), which allows Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) experts to be sharded using FSDP within an Expert Parallel (EP) group. This is a valuable addition for improving memory efficiency in large MoE models. The implementation is well-integrated into the existing DeviceMesh and NativeFSDPStrategy classes. I have identified a potential robustness issue in the new get_ranks_for_dims method and a redundant import that should be addressed.
|
|
||
| def create_process_group(self, dims): | ||
| """Create a process group by dims""" | ||
| import torch.distributed as dist |
No description provided.