-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
Preview Invalidation proposal #144
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
MLCommons CLA bot All contributors have signed the MLCommons CLA ✍️ ✅ |
|
Agreed by Training working group, David T to bring to the inference Working Group for review and approval |
|
Poll results https://docs.google.com/forms/d/155I0TjpdD32MxD7PYdUU6ml8sgzWcdmpjB5QxpXc91Q/edit#responses Dell objected to the existing proposal. Lior objected to include the mention in the press release (item#2) in the PR. |
|
WG decided to take majority vote into consideration and approve this PR. |
|
@peladodigital Can this be merged please? |
|
@TheKanter can you please merge this. |
Proposing formal text for how to invalidate preview submissions. This has been discussed in the Inference and Training WG's at some length already, and folks recommended putting something in writing so we have something to debate concretely.
Co-authored-by: Dilip Sequeira <dsequeira@nvidia.com>
Co-authored-by: Dilip Sequeira <dsequeira@nvidia.com>
ed6e4ba to
bb668eb
Compare
Proposing formal text for how to invalidate preview submissions. This has been discussed in the Inference and Training WG's at some length already, and folks recommended putting something in writing so we have something to debate concretely.