Skip to content

Conversation

@JasonYeMSFT
Copy link
Member

What does this PR do?

[Provide a clear, concise description of the changes]

Users who want to run Azure MCP as a remote server with OBO flow need to add downstream API permissions to the server app registration. This PR adds a markdown file documenting the tool namespace to API permissions map to help users figure out what they need to add for the tools they want to use in their self-hosted server.

[Any additional context, screenshots, or information that helps reviewers]

GitHub issue number?

#1450

Pre-merge Checklist

  • Required for All PRs
    • Read contribution guidelines
    • PR title clearly describes the change
    • Commit history is clean with descriptive messages (cleanup guide)
    • Added comprehensive tests for new/modified functionality
    • Updated servers/Azure.Mcp.Server/CHANGELOG.md and/or servers/Fabric.Mcp.Server/CHANGELOG.md for product changes (features, bug fixes, UI/UX, updated dependencies)
  • For MCP tool changes:
    • One tool per PR: This PR adds or modifies only one MCP tool for faster review cycles
    • Updated servers/Azure.Mcp.Server/README.md and/or servers/Fabric.Mcp.Server/README.md documentation
    • Validate README.md changes using script at eng/scripts/Process-PackageReadMe.ps1. See Package README
    • Updated command list in /servers/Azure.Mcp.Server/docs/azmcp-commands.md and/or /docs/fabric-commands.md
    • Run .\eng\scripts\Update-AzCommandsMetadata.ps1 to update tool metadata in azmcp-commands.md (required for CI)
    • For new or modified tool descriptions, ran ToolDescriptionEvaluator and obtained a score of 0.4 or more and a top 3 ranking for all related test prompts
    • For tools with new names, including new tools or renamed tools, update consolidated-tools.json
    • For new tools associated with Azure services or publicly available tools/APIs/products, add URL to documentation in the PR description
  • Extra steps for Azure MCP Server tool changes:
    • Updated test prompts in /servers/Azure.Mcp.Server/docs/e2eTestPrompts.md
    • 👉 For Community (non-Microsoft team member) PRs:
      • Security review: Reviewed code for security vulnerabilities, malicious code, or suspicious activities before running tests (crypto mining, spam, data exfiltration, etc.)
      • Manual tests run: added comment /azp run mcp - pullrequest - live to run Live Test Pipeline

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds a new documentation file that maps Azure MCP tool namespaces to their required API permissions. The file helps users configure downstream API permissions when setting up Azure MCP Server as a remote server with On-Behalf-Of (OBO) authentication flow.

Key changes:

  • Added api-permissions.md file documenting namespace-to-API permission mappings
  • Includes two tables: one for APIs with exposed permissions and one for APIs without exposed API permissions
  • Covers 13 different Azure services including Storage, Key Vault, Cosmos DB, Event Hubs, and others
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

servers/Azure.Mcp.Server/azd-templates/api-permissions.md:3

  • The documentation should include introductory context explaining when and how to use this information. Consider adding: 1) A brief explanation of when users need to configure these permissions (e.g., when setting up Azure MCP as a remote server with OBO flow for service-to-service authentication), 2) Basic instructions or a link to documentation on how to add API permissions to an Azure AD app registration, and 3) An explanation of the relationship between namespaces and the required permissions.
# API permissions

A table of known API permissions of downstream APIs that can be called by Azure MCP.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Untriaged

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant