Skip to content

gulp-metalsmith@1.1.0 untested ⚠️#92

Open
greenkeeperio-bot wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
greenkeeper-gulp-metalsmith-1.1.0
Open

gulp-metalsmith@1.1.0 untested ⚠️#92
greenkeeperio-bot wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
greenkeeper-gulp-metalsmith-1.1.0

Conversation

@greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello lovely humans,

gulp-metalsmith just published its new version 1.1.0.

State No tests ⚠️
Dependency gulp-metalsmith
New version 1.1.0
Type devDependency

This version is covered by your current version range, but I could not detect automated tests for this project. Without a test suite I can not really tell whether your project still works.

I was looking at the latest commit of your default branch, but GitHub said there is no status attached to it.

Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.

Good luck with your project ✨

You rock!

🌴


The new version differs by 9 commits .

  • 16f2e77 Update dependencies, bump version
  • b10e3a5 Use cloned vinyl file instead of creating it from scratch
  • 31a343c Merge remote-tracking branch 'dominic/master'
  • ffe8509 Test for exposing stat object
  • fdb0c1d Merge pull request #2 from zephyrweb/patch-2
  • 36dc08f Explain how to require the tool in README and tutorial
  • d4cdbda restored basename in files for building which occurs outside of the gulp working directory
  • 7e8ce31 Fixes for failed test
  • 08d8ba9 Expose file.stat object to plugins

See the full diff.


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? ⚡ greenkeeper upgrade

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants