This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 5, 2022. It is now read-only.
Use branch main instead of master #36
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Most convention using now main instead even github. Now when we want create new repository the default name branch is main, so keep master branch name is not good, it will force change default name branch to master for publish doc / gh page
Author
|
You can also create new version |
|
Can we merge this? or even use something smarter such as action vars to find the current branch? |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Most convention using now main instead of master even github.
Now when we want create new repository the default name branch is main, so keep master branch name is not good, it will force change default name branch to master for publish doc / gh page