Conversation
Do you mean that it ought to be a different PR? (That may help the review process.) |
|
I would not go so far as "ought to", the fix is quite trivial, but if you would prefer a different PR, I can do it. |
Ok. Since there is a number of definitions that are added to
I think that it is better (different concerns, two commits are maybe better also for the git log). |
|
@Tragicus could you rephrase your commit message so as to make a single line separated from the title by a white line, and verbatim (otherwise github does not pick it up) |
|
Argh, I accidentally merged this instead of #1183 and I don't have push right on master to revert that, could someone do it, maybe @CohenCyril ? |
|
Done with @affeldt-aist |
|
Can I also rebase and clean up now? |
|
Sure, thanks |
|
Reopened at #1198 |
Motivation for this change
Adds a proof of Zorn's lemma, Hausdorff maximal principle and the well ordering principle.
Contains a patch of contra that we may want to extract.
Checklist
CHANGELOG_UNRELEASED.mdReference: How to document
Reminder to reviewers