Conversation
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
This requires a small change before it can be approved. Your existing tests are well-written and cover several important scenarios! However, the test suite is incomplete as it's missing one of the required examples from the task description.
Please add a test case to src/splitInteger.test.js to verify that splitInteger(32, 6) correctly returns [5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6]. Covering all the specified examples is crucial for ensuring the function meets all requirements. Once that's added, this will be ready to go!
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Important
Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.
Tip
If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.
Caution
Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.
Footnotes
| test('should add zeros if value < numberOfParts', () => { | ||
|
|
||
| expect(splitInteger(2, 7)).toEqual([0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1]); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You're missing a test case for one of the examples provided in the requirements. Please add a test to verify that splitInteger(32, 6) correctly returns [5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6].
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Great work adding the final test case for splitInteger(32, 6)! All the requirements from the task description have been met, so I am approving your solution.
Please note that the automated checks are failing due to a minor linting error. You can fix this by removing the extra space inside the array in your last test case in src/splitInteger.test.js.
Additionally, as a suggestion for improvement, consider updating the description for that test. The current description, 'should add zeros if value < numberOfParts', is a bit misleading for the test case. A more accurate description would be something like 'should correctly split a number when the remainder is not zero'.
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Footnotes
| expect(splitInteger(17, 4)).toEqual([4, 4, 4, 5]); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('should add zeros if value < numberOfParts', () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This test description is misleading. In the test case splitInteger(32, 6), the value (32) is not less than numberOfParts (6), so the description doesn't match the test.
A more accurate description might be something like, 'should correctly split a number when the remainder is not zero'.
2 participants
No description provided.