Remove redundant [<RequireQualifiedAccess>]

[cotyar]

No description provided.

[mastoj]

@cotyar looks like you deleted the paket.bootstrapper.exe file. I use that in the build script to get the latest paket.exe.

[cotyar]

Ops ... apologise Shall we get the latest bootstrapper and rename it into paket.exe?

…

On Sat, 17 Mar 2018, 21:05 Tomas Jansson, ***@***.***> wrote: @cotyar <https://github.com/cotyar> looks like you deleted the paket.bootstrapper.exe file. I use that in the build script to get the latest paket.exe. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#18 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEvtbek0JRaKF_rdeDslyHsKWviK6Wwxks5tfXqAgaJpZM4SuEFu> .

[mastoj]

@cotyar why do you think we should do that? Can't we just have it named paket.bootstrapper.exe and let it pull down the latest paket.exe if it is missing?

[mastoj]

To be clear, I'm not saying I'm right or wrong here. Recommendation here states that it is the bootstrapper that should be added to source control: https://fsprojects.github.io/Paket/faq.html#What-files-should-I-commit

[cotyar]

Happy with any of the options - it is totally your call. It can be done because of: When paket.bootstrapper.exe is renamed to paket.exe, the real paket.exe is downloaded to a temporary location and executed with all arguments passed directly. fsprojects.github.io/Paket/bootstrapper.html

…

On Sat, 17 Mar 2018, 21:44 Tomas Jansson, ***@***.***> wrote: To be clear, I'm not saying I'm right or wrong here. Recommendation here states that it is the bootstrapper that should be added to source control: https://fsprojects.github.io/Paket/faq.html#What-files-should-I-commit — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#18 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEvtbapitSUA9_SzNrzdvcvI2No5mH3aks5tfYPagaJpZM4SuEFu> .

[mastoj]

let's go for your suggestion then :)