forked from apache/datafusion
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
20426: fix: Prefer numeric in type coercion for comparisons #294
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
martin-augment
wants to merge
12
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
pr-20426-2026-03-25-21-13-54
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ba74cd2
Revised approach to fixing numeric/string type coercion
neilconway 4bf9fe4
Revert map key coercion regression, fix other tests
neilconway 1cd2602
cargo fmt
neilconway e2272f0
More rationale for type union behavior
neilconway e52f506
Fix comment typos
neilconway 8084010
Apply suggestion from @martin-g
neilconway 7667bc1
Per review, explicitly test for IN list type mismatch error
neilconway 43657dd
Add upgrade notes for change
neilconway 36cd3df
Fix docs prettier lint
neilconway e12bad2
Fix think in docs
neilconway 6bdfc37
Doc tweaks
neilconway b73e41a
Merge origin/main into neilc/type-coercion-str-numeric
neilconway File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The comment says the literal cast is constant-folded in the simplified expression, but the expected simplified string still includes
CAST(202410 AS Int64). If folding is intended, this test may not currently validate it (or the comment may be outdated).Severity: low
🤖 Was this useful? React with 👍 or 👎, or 🚀 if it prevented an incident/outage.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
value:useful; category:bug; feedback: The Augment AI reviewer is correct! The comment claims that the result is folded into a constant but the unit test result still uses
CAST(...), so the comment is not correct and needs to be improved.