forked from apache/arrow-rs
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
8829: Allow Users to Provide Custom ArrayFormatters when Pretty-Printing Record Batches
#22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
martin-augment
wants to merge
8
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
pr-8829-2025-11-14-11-28-04
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4ff1f3f
Draft for implementing custom ArrayFormatters
tobixdev 47f00a7
Improve custom pretty printing
tobixdev 37bac6f
Add sanity check for number of columns
tobixdev 1e8f101
Formatting
tobixdev fcc6478
Minor fixes
tobixdev 0599d17
Use accessors in FormatOptions
tobixdev 6882394
Move ArrayFormatterFactory into FormatOptions
tobixdev d186741
Move ArrayFormatterFactory to display module to avoid issues with fea…
tobixdev File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Bug: Broken Hash/Equality Contract
The
PartialEqimplementation forFormatOptionsdoes not compare thetypes_infofield, but theHashimplementation includes it. This violates Rust's hash/equality contract: if two values are equal according toPartialEq, they must produce the same hash.FormatOptionsvalues differing only intypes_infowill be equal but have different hashes, causing issues in hash-based collections.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
value:useful; category:bug; feedback:The Bugbot AI reviewer is correct! The implementations of Hash and PartialEq need to be synchronized. Prevents bugs when instances of such structs are used HashMap/HashSet collections which use buckets for the items with collisions.