Conversation
smilesun
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
does this configuration work with master already?
|
Yes, this already works on the master branch. |
|
|
@lisab00 ,I have merged the shared parameter branch into master, and master into this branch, when you get time, maybe you can test if your yaml file works. I would say it is better to test this yaml file than the pacs. the pacs can be done on Friday so the week after we get the results. |
|
So the conclusion is 3 epochs are not enough to get a good result ?
…On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 at 09:24, Lisa ***@***.***> wrote:
[image: bench_mnist_grid_graphic]
<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/73993822/268207167-bc31c13c-3b3c-4830-bc25-44e33a15580d.png>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#348 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAELKRSN4W5RSYNUIOVAAY3X2P7BJANCNFSM6AAAAAA4KPBLXQ>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
|
Should I run this file with 100 epochs on master to compare with fbopt (like you told me on slack) |
|
All algorithm please
…On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 at 09:51, Lisa ***@***.***> wrote:
Should I run this file with 100 epochs on master to compare with fbopt
(like you told me on slack)
or should I create a new file contaning all algorithms?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#348 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAELKRWZSXCKQFPPYQFOYKLX2QCJBANCNFSM6AAAAAA4KPBLXQ>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
|
I added another file with more algos, but it's not working yet |
|
I took a look at the file, shouldn't the file be based on the yaml file Carla has generated yesterday? Since that already include a lot of algorihtms and one only need to change the task and neural network? |
|
Which file did Carla create yesterday? |
maybe she did not push to any branch. But i think we could start using your new yaml file to make it work first, if a small one does not work, a big one won't work neither. |
would be great to have the error message so i can look into it as well. |
|
but the hyperparameter sampling itself should work, I tested it on master |
|
Also, I based my file on this one: https://github.com/marrlab/DomainLab/blob/master/examples/benchmark/benchmark_pacs_resnet.yaml I included algos up until line 150, changed dataset and sampling mode |
| max: 10000 | ||
| step: 100 | ||
| num: 2 | ||
| distribution: uniform |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
why grid search would have a distribution?
@lisab00 , I was wrong, actually she pushed the changes to the master already https://github.com/marrlab/DomainLab/blob/master/examples/benchmark/benchmark_pacs_resnet.yaml |
but the file is not grid search, so there is distribution |
|
I thought you need distribution for grid search as well |
I agree, will take some deeper look into it |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #348 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 95.14% 95.14%
=======================================
Files 124 124
Lines 4862 4862
=======================================
Hits 4626 4626
Misses 236 236
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |



No description provided.