This project demonstrates a complete rearchitecture of ServiceNow's Flow Designer using modern web technologies. The goal is to address key customer pain points while aligning with ServiceNow's strategic direction toward Web Components and the Now Experience UI Framework.
- Real-time execution monitoring
- Breakpoints and step-through debugging
- Variable inspection and performance profiling
- Collaborative debugging capabilities
- 91% smaller bundle size vs React
- Virtual scrolling for large flows
- Web Workers for heavy computations
- Offline-first architecture
- Multi-user editing
- Live cursor tracking
- Conflict resolution
- WebSocket-based synchronization
- Web Components with TypeScript
- Event-driven state management
- Micro-frontend approach
- Progressive Web App capabilities
| React Approach | Web Components Approach | Benefit |
|---|---|---|
useState() + useEffect() |
@state() + lifecycle methods |
91% smaller bundle |
| Props drilling | Event bus communication | Better decoupling |
| Immutable updates | Direct mutation + events | Simpler state flow |
| Context API | Global event system | Framework agnostic |
Example: Adding a Node
// 1. User clicks β Event emitted
eventBus.emit('node-type-add', { nodeType: 'approver' });
// 2. Builder listens β Creates node
private onNodeTypeAdd(data: { nodeType: string }): void {
this.addNode(data.nodeType);
}
// 3. State updated β All components notified
eventBus.emit(EVENTS.WORKFLOW_UPDATED, this.workflow);No Redux/Context needed - just events! Components stay synchronized through a simple pub/sub system:
// Global event bus
export const eventBus = new EventBus();
// Components subscribe to changes
eventBus.on(EVENTS.NODE_SELECTED, this.onNodeSelected.bind(this));
eventBus.on(EVENTS.PROPERTY_CHANGED, this.onPropertyChanged.bind(this));
// State changes propagate automatically
private updateNodeProperty(path: string, value: any): void {
// Direct mutation (simpler than React's immutable updates)
this.selectedNode.configuration.approver = value;
// Notify all interested components
eventBus.emit(EVENTS.PROPERTY_CHANGED, { nodeId, path, value });
}Self-contained Web Components with clear responsibilities:
@customElement('approval-canvas')
export class ApprovalCanvas extends LitElement {
@property({ type: Object }) workflow: ApprovalWorkflow | null = null;
@state() private canvasSize: { width: number; height: number };
// Component manages its own state and rendering
render() {
return html`
<div class="canvas-container">
${this.workflow.nodes.map(node => html`
<approval-node .node=${node}></approval-node>
`)}
</div>
`;
}
}Scenario: User changes approver in properties panel
- Properties Panel β Updates node data directly
- Event Bus β Broadcasts
property-changedevent - Canvas β Receives event, updates workflow state
- Canvas β Emits
workflow-updatedevent - All Components β Automatically re-render with new data
Result: No prop drilling, no complex state management - just simple events!
- Frontend: TypeScript + Lit Element (Web Components)
- State Management: Event-driven architecture with immutable updates
- Backend: ServiceNow APIs + WebSockets
- Build Tools: Vite + ServiceNow CLI
- Testing: Jest + Web Test Runner + Playwright
- Documentation: Storybook
servicenow/
βββ docs/ # Documentation
β βββ interview-script.md # Interview presentation script
β βββ architecture.md # Detailed architecture docs
β βββ api-specs.md # API specifications
βββ src/ # Source code
β βββ components/ # Web Components
β βββ services/ # Business logic
β βββ utils/ # Utilities
βββ tests/ # Test files
βββ stories/ # Storybook stories
βββ architecture/ # Architecture diagrams
- Node.js 18+
- ServiceNow CLI
- ServiceNow development instance
npm install
snc setupnpm run dev # Start development server
npm run test:watch # Run tests in watch mode
npm run storybook # Component documentationnpm run build # Production build
snc deploy --target=dev # Deploy to development
snc deploy --target=prod # Deploy to production- Complex Approval Workflows β Enhanced approval builder with visual routing
- Poor Debugging Experience β Real-time debugging with breakpoints
- Performance Issues β Optimized rendering and virtual scrolling
- Integration Complexity β Simplified API integration layer
- Limited Reusability β Modular component architecture
- vs Microsoft Power Automate: Better enterprise security, real-time collaboration
- vs Zapier: More powerful debugging, better ServiceNow integration
- vs Traditional Tools: Modern UX, real-time capabilities, better performance
- Phase 1: Proof of Concept (4 weeks)
- Phase 2: Advanced Features (8 weeks)
- Phase 3: Production Migration (12 weeks)
docs/tech-stack-architecture.md- Tech Stack & Architecture Overview - Complete technology stack, architecture patterns, and how everything works togetherdocs/why-lit-beats-react.md- Why Lit is better than React - Performance, architecture, and strategic advantagesdocs/architecture.md- Complete technical architecture and design decisionsdocs/implementation-showcase.md- Detailed Web Components vs React comparison with code examplesdocs/event-bus-security.md- Event Bus Security - Security considerations, native browser alternatives, and production recommendationsdocs/react-security-reality-check.md- React Security Reality Check - Honest assessment: React security updates are NOT frequent, security is NOT the reason to choose Litdocs/web-components-vs-react-standards.md- Web Components vs React: Standards vs Framework - Why Lit works everywhere (browser standards) while React doesn't (framework-specific)docs/why-lit-no-event-bus.md- Why Lit Doesn't Include an Event Bus - Lit's philosophy: use native browser events (CustomEvent) instead of custom abstractionsdocs/interview-script.md- Complete system design presentation scriptdocs/senior-engineer-interview-answers.md- Senior Engineer Interview Answers - Comprehensive answers to common software engineer interview questions (based on Gusto's guide)docs/api-reference.md- API specifications and integration details
See docs/interview-script.md for the complete system design presentation script, including:
- Problem statement and research
- Technical architecture deep dive
- Implementation strategy
- Risk mitigation
- Competitive analysis
Key Implementation Examples:
- Why Lit is Better: See
docs/why-lit-beats-react.mdfor comprehensive comparison - Code Examples: See
docs/implementation-showcase.mdfor detailed code comparisons
This is a demonstration project for a ServiceNow Staff Full Stack Engineer interview. The architecture and implementation showcase modern web development practices aligned with ServiceNow's strategic direction.