Skip to content

Conversation

@starius
Copy link
Collaborator

@starius starius commented Dec 21, 2025

Previously the log was corrupted:

confirmed in tx: &{2 [0xc000e802a0] [0xc00087fb80 0xc00087fba0] 205}

Pull Request Checklist

  • Update release_notes.md if your PR contains major features, breaking changes or bugfixes

Previously the log was corrupted:
confirmed in tx: &{2 [0xc000e802a0] [0xc00087fb80 0xc00087fba0] 205}
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @starius, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a minor but important issue in the reservation module where a debug log line was outputting a raw Go struct representation instead of a clear transaction identifier. The change modifies the logging format to explicitly print the transaction hash, significantly improving the readability and utility of the debug logs for tracking transaction confirmations.

Highlights

  • Log Output Fix: Corrected a debug log statement that was previously printing a corrupted or unreadable representation of a transaction object.
  • Improved Debugging: Ensured that the transaction ID (TxID) is now correctly logged, providing more meaningful and actionable information for debugging purposes.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request correctly fixes a debug log message by logging the transaction ID instead of the full transaction struct. This improves log readability. I've also added a comment suggesting a defensive check to prevent a potential panic, which would make the code more robust.

@starius
Copy link
Collaborator Author

starius commented Dec 21, 2025

I've also added a comment suggesting a defensive check to prevent a potential panic, which would make the code more robust

The code already relies on confInfo.Tx != nil

@starius starius marked this pull request as ready for review December 22, 2025 18:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants