Assigning objects with static storage duration a zero value is redundant#446
Open
Assigning objects with static storage duration a zero value is redundant#446
Conversation
…ant, since this happens implicitly. Signed-off-by: Tom Schwindl <schwindl@posteo.de>
lfos
force-pushed
the
pu
branch
2 times, most recently
from
d6eb6e7 to
d81b00c
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Assigning objects with static storage duration a zero value is redundant since this happens implicitly.
It's also inconsistent since we sometimes do it and sometimes don't.
Signed-off-by: Tom Schwindl schwindl@posteo.de