Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade org.springframework:spring-web from 3.2.6.RELEASE to 6.2.17#113

Open
lcrowther-snyk wants to merge 2 commits intomasterfrom
snyk-fix-641640b978fb4c1728bbe63d143b6b68
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade org.springframework:spring-web from 3.2.6.RELEASE to 6.2.17#113
lcrowther-snyk wants to merge 2 commits intomasterfrom
snyk-fix-641640b978fb4c1728bbe63d143b6b68

Conversation

@lcrowther-snyk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the maven dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • pom.xml

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score Upgrade
low severity Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')
SNYK-JAVA-ORGSPRINGFRAMEWORK-15701755
  40   org.springframework:spring-web:
3.2.6.RELEASE -> 6.2.17
Major version upgrade No Path Found No Known Exploit

Breaking Change Risk

Merge Risk: High

Notice: This assessment is enhanced by AI.


Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

@lcrowther-snyk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Merge Risk: High

Upgrading from Spring Framework 3.2.6 to 6.2.17 is a massive undertaking that spans three major versions (4.x, 5.x, 6.x) and introduces multiple layers of significant breaking changes. This is not a simple dependency update and will require a major, planned migration effort.

Key Breaking Changes & Required Actions:

  • Java 17 Baseline: Spring Framework 6.x requires a minimum of Java 17. Your application and build environment must be upgraded from the Java 6+ baseline used by Spring 3.2.

  • Migration to Jakarta EE: This is the most impactful change. Spring 6 is built on Jakarta EE 9+, which moves all enterprise Java packages from the javax.* namespace to jakarta.*. This requires a codebase-wide find-and-replace for all imports (e.g., javax.servlet.* becomes jakarta.servlet.*). This change affects core web APIs and any persistence layers like JPA.

  • Removed APIs and Integrations: Numerous features and integrations that were deprecated in versions 4.x and 5.x have been completely removed in 6.0. Notable removals include:

    • RPC-style remoting (HTTP Invoker, Hessian).
    • Support for older versions of libraries like Hibernate 3/4, Ehcache 2, and Joda-Time.
    • Many deprecated classes and methods from previous versions.
  • Spring MVC and WebFlux: While Spring 5 introduced the reactive WebFlux module, your existing Spring MVC application does not need to be rewritten. However, many underlying APIs have evolved. For example, ListenableFuture has been replaced by CompletableFuture.

Recommendation:
This upgrade cannot be performed in a single step. A staged migration is strongly recommended:

  1. First, upgrade to the latest Spring Framework 4.3.x release to resolve initial incompatibilities.
  2. Then, migrate to Spring Framework 5.3.x, which will require a move to at least Java 8.
  3. Finally, undertake the significant migration to Spring Framework 6.x, which includes the Java 17 and Jakarta EE namespace changes.

This is a high-risk, high-effort migration that will touch nearly every part of the application.

Source: Spring Framework 6.0 Release Notes, Upgrading to Spring Framework 5.x

Notice 🤖: This content was augmented using artificial intelligence. AI-generated content may contain errors and should be reviewed for accuracy before use.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants