Skip to content

Conversation

@paulswartz
Copy link
Contributor

Docker containers can run on a read-only filesystem, which has some security benefits. The current updater implementation writes the .tgz file to the filesystem, so it does not work in such an environment.

This provides a read_only_fs? configuration which stores the data in memory while loading, and does not write the ETS table to disk for future loading.

@paulswartz paulswartz force-pushed the read-only branch 4 times, most recently from 2811a30 to 9bd96ae Compare December 27, 2022 17:02
@paulswartz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Docker containers can run on a read-only filesystem, which has some
security benefits. The current updater implementation writes the .tgz
file to the filesystem, so it does not work in such an environment.

This provides a `read_only_fs?` configuration which stores the data in
memory while loading, and does not write the ETS table to disk for
future loading.
@paulswartz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased on top of the latest master, and remove the other implementation of the GitHub CI.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant