Add mass fraction multi-phase table to sesame2spiner

[adamdempsey90]

PR Summary

This adds the mass fraction SESAME table to the spiner tables that sesame2spiner outputs (if it exists). Tested in a downstream code.

Putting this up now for an initial review.

I still need to add the mass fractions to the spiner EOS class. Are we okay with adding new MassFractionFromDensityTemperature functions to all EOS classes?

Still TODO:

• Add this field to the spiner EOS
• Some sort of test

PR Checklist

• Adds a test for any bugs fixed. Adds tests for new features.
• Format your changes by using the make format command after configuring with cmake.
• Document any new features, update documentation for changes made.
• Make sure the copyright notice on any files you modified is up to date.
• After creating a pull request, note it in the CHANGELOG.md file.
• LANL employees: make sure tests pass both on the github CI and on the Darwin CI

If preparing for a new release, in addition please check the following:

• Update the version in cmake.
• Move the changes in the CHANGELOG.md file under a new header for the new release, and reset the categories.
• Maintainers: ensure spackages are up to date:
  • LANL-internal team, update XCAP spackages
  • Current maintainer of upstream spackages, submit MR to spack

[Yurlungur]

Nice! Glad it was a simple change. Regarding adding mass fractions to every EOS class... Broadly I'd be supportive of this, if we had an error message/stub in the base class as the default behavior. Clearly mass fractions aren't sensible for all EOS's but they are for enough EOS's we might want this.

[adamdempsey90]

Nice! Glad it was a simple change. Regarding adding mass fractions to every EOS class... Broadly I'd be supportive of this, if we had an error message/stub in the base class as the default behavior. Clearly mass fractions aren't sensible for all EOS's but they are for enough EOS's we might want this.

It looks like the StellarCollapse EOS already has MassFractionsFromDensityTemperature

[Yurlungur]

Nice! Glad it was a simple change. Regarding adding mass fractions to every EOS class... Broadly I'd be supportive of this, if we had an error message/stub in the base class as the default behavior. Clearly mass fractions aren't sensible for all EOS's but they are for enough EOS's we might want this.

It looks like the StellarCollapse EOS already has MassFractionsFromDensityTemperature

I believe Helmholtz does too... or if it doesn't, it could be exposed.

[adamdempsey90]

I am re-using the EOS rho-T grid for this but in testing we are seeing that maybe that isn't great, e.g., instead of clustering around STP, we probably want to cluster the points around phase transitions. I could add another set of parameters to the inputs that describe the grid decomp for just mass fractions?

[Yurlungur]

I think that makes a lot of sense. Yeah there's no reason the two grids have to be the same.

[buechlerm]

If you're going to use different grids, I would just use the sesame grid. (piecewise linear). eospac just does bilinear interpolation for mass fractions so we should not need higher density than sesame.