Skip to content

Set related_name of created_by and updated_by fields according to mod…#20

Open
tcx9871 wants to merge 2 commits intolambdalisue:masterfrom
tcx9871:master
Open

Set related_name of created_by and updated_by fields according to mod…#20
tcx9871 wants to merge 2 commits intolambdalisue:masterfrom
tcx9871:master

Conversation

@tcx9871
Copy link

@tcx9871 tcx9871 commented Jan 23, 2019

…el app_label and class_name. This allows usage with abstract models.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.005%) to 99.265% when pulling eff6564 on tcx9871:master into aa296bf on lambdalisue:master.

2 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.005%) to 99.265% when pulling eff6564 on tcx9871:master into aa296bf on lambdalisue:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.005%) to 99.265% when pulling eff6564 on tcx9871:master into aa296bf on lambdalisue:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Mar 6, 2019

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling eb744dc on tcx9871:master into 24945ac on lambdalisue:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.005%) to 99.265% when pulling eff6564 on tcx9871:master into aa296bf on lambdalisue:master.

Tomáš Kostrhun and others added 2 commits February 3, 2022 14:48
@PetrDlouhy
Copy link
Collaborator

I have tested this, but it changes the related names of the related fields. It changes the asset_create into assets_asset_create, so it is incompatible with current implementations.

This would either need to go through some deprecation process, or better it should stay compatible.

Copy link
Collaborator

@PetrDlouhy PetrDlouhy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have tested this, but it changes the related names of the related fields. It changes the asset_create into assets_asset_create, so it is incompatible with current implementations.

This would either need to go through some deprecation process, or better it should stay compatible.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants