Fix permissions instructions #38
Conversation
One subtle issue is that when printing the exception, line breaks were
being inserted according to the terminal width. To avoid this, I broke the
command into short lines.
The error now reads:
```
UsbDeviceError:
You do not have sufficient access to the device. You probably want to add the a udev
rule in /etc/udev/rules.d with the following command:
echo 'ACTION=="add",'\
'SUBSYSTEMS=="usb",'\
'ATTRS{idVendor}=="0922",'\
'ATTRS{idProduct}=="1001",'\
'MODE="0666"' \
| sudo tee /etc/udev/rules.d/91-labelle-0922-1001.rules
Next, refresh udev with:
sudo udevadm control --reload-rules
sudo udevadm trigger --attr-match=idVendor="0922"
Finally, turn your device off and back on again to activate the new permissions.
If this still does not resolve the problem, you might need to reboot.
In case rebooting is necessary, please report this at <labelle-org#6>.
We are still trying to figure out a simple procedure which works for everyone.
In case you still cannot connect, or if you have any information or ideas, please
post them at that link.
```
|
@tomers, would you like to cut a patch release for this? |
|
@maresb, I tried creating a new release, and failed: https://github.com/labelle-org/labelle/actions/runs/8914282659 Please advise how to resolve the relase issue. |
|
Hi @tomers, I think I see the issue. You tagged the release as
That corresponds to the error message:
You could try editing the release and changing the tag to Just in case you run into trouble with "Generate release notes" after deleting the current release, I've copied it below for safety: This is mainly a maintenance relase, with no new-features. What's ChangedMaintenance
Full Changelog: v1.2.1...1.2.2 |
| sudo udevadm control --reload-rules | ||
| sudo udevadm trigger --attr-match=idVendor="0922" | ||
| sudo udevadm control --reload-rules | ||
| sudo udevadm trigger --attr-match=idVendor="0922" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is sudo udevadm trigger not sufficient?
3 participants
This fixes the issue pointed out in #4 (comment)