Skip to content

Conversation

@alogfans
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Separate interface and implementation of Mooncake TE, therefore TENT has better backward compatibility.

Type of Change

  • Types
    • Bug fix
    • New feature
      • Transfer Engine
      • Mooncake Store
      • Mooncake EP
      • Integration
      • P2P Store
      • Python Wheel
    • Breaking change
    • CI/CD
    • Documentation update
    • Other

How Has This Been Tested?

Checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code.
  • I have updated the documentation.
  • I have added tests to prove my changes are effective.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @alogfans, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly refactors the TransferEngine component by separating its interface from its implementation. This architectural change, utilizing the Pimpl idiom, moves all internal state and complex logic into a new TransferEngineImpl class. The TransferEngine now acts as a lightweight wrapper, forwarding all method calls to its private implementation. This design improves modularity, reduces compilation dependencies, and is intended to provide better backward compatibility for external components like TENT.

Highlights

  • Pimpl Idiom Adoption: The TransferEngine class has been refactored to utilize the Pimpl (Pointer to Implementation) idiom.
  • Separation of Concerns: The public interface of TransferEngine is now distinct from its internal implementation details, which reside in a new TransferEngineImpl class.
  • Improved Backward Compatibility: This architectural change aims to enhance backward compatibility for TENT by isolating changes to the implementation, reducing the impact on external components.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request refactors the TransferEngine class by separating its interface from its implementation using the Pimpl (pointer to implementation) idiom. The implementation details are moved into a new TransferEngineImpl class. This is a great architectural improvement that will help with backward compatibility and reduce compilation dependencies for clients of TransferEngine.

The changes are well-executed. I have a few suggestions to improve const-correctness, header hygiene, and performance. Most notably, the const qualifier was dropped from getLocalTopology, which is a breaking API change that should be reverted. I've also pointed out some unnecessary headers and a place where an extra copy can be avoided.

I am having trouble creating individual review comments. Click here to see my feedback.

mooncake-transfer-engine/include/transfer_engine.h (115)

high

The const qualifier was removed from this method's signature. The original method was const, and the implementation it forwards to in TransferEngineImpl is also const. Removing const is a breaking change for clients that might be calling this on a const TransferEngine object. Please restore the const qualifier to maintain API compatibility and const-correctness. You will also need to add const to the method's implementation in transfer_engine.cpp.

    std::shared_ptr<Topology> getLocalTopology() const;

mooncake-transfer-engine/include/transfer_engine_impl.h (18-21)

medium

These headers appear to be unnecessary in this header file and were likely copied over during refactoring. Please remove them to keep includes minimal. If any of these are needed by transfer_engine_impl.cpp, they should be included there directly, preferably using their C++ standard library versions (e.g., <cstring>, <climits>, <cerrno>).

mooncake-transfer-engine/include/transfer_engine_impl.h (150-151)

medium

The remote_agent parameter is taken by value. While the wrapper in TransferEngine uses std::move, this still results in an extra move construction for the std::string. To improve efficiency, consider taking remote_agent by const std::string&. This avoids the extra move while still allowing efficient handling of rvalues from the caller. Remember to update the implementation in transfer_engine_impl.cpp as well.

    int sendNotifyByName(const std::string& remote_agent,
                         TransferMetadata::NotifyDesc notify_msg);

mooncake-transfer-engine/src/transfer_engine_impl.cpp (20)

medium

The code uses errno, which is defined in <cerrno>. Please explicitly include this header for correctness and portability, as its inclusion via other headers is not guaranteed.

#include <cerrno>
#include <cstring>

@alogfans alogfans requested review from stmatengss and ykwd December 22, 2025 05:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant