Skip to content

[KEP-4680]: Update ResourceHealthStatus documentation for Beta in v1.36#54420

Open
harche wants to merge 1 commit intokubernetes:dev-1.36from
harche:dev-1.36
Open

[KEP-4680]: Update ResourceHealthStatus documentation for Beta in v1.36#54420
harche wants to merge 1 commit intokubernetes:dev-1.36from
harche:dev-1.36

Conversation

@harche
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@harche harche commented Feb 12, 2026

Description

Updates documentation to reflect ResourceHealthStatus graduation to Beta (enabled by default) in v1.36.

KEP: kubernetes/enhancements#4680

Issue

Closes: kubernetes/enhancements#4680

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 12, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the 1.36 milestone Feb 12, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the language/en Issues or PRs related to English language label Feb 12, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Feb 12, 2026
@harche
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

harche commented Feb 12, 2026

/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 12, 2026
@netlify
Copy link
Copy Markdown

netlify bot commented Feb 12, 2026

Pull request preview available for checking

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 310a52f
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/kubernetes-io-main-staging/deploys/69c6935231ff660008fcdfce
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-54420--kubernetes-io-main-staging.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 24, 2026
@singh1203
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hello @harche, @SergeyKanzhelev and @ArangoGutierrez 👋, v1.36 Docs Team here again!

Please take a look at Documenting for a release - PR Ready for Review to get your PR ready for review before Tuesday 31st March 2026.

Please let us know once your PR is fully Ready for Review -- meaning all documentation updates are complete and it's awaiting reviewer feedback -- so we can update our tracking.

Thank you!

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@SergeyKanzhelev SergeyKanzhelev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 26, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: SergeyKanzhelev
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign natalisucks for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

DetailsGit tree hash: 94db293baf6342dd2587db5e4c7fd9fc4a5a1022

Signed-off-by: Harshal Patil <12152047+harche@users.noreply.github.com>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 27, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 27, 2026
@harche harche changed the title WIP: Document ResourceHealthStatus beta graduation for v1.36 [KEP-4680]: Update ResourceHealthStatus documentation for Beta in v1.36 Mar 27, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Mar 27, 2026
@harche
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

harche commented Mar 27, 2026

/hold

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 27, 2026
@rphillips
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 27, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

DetailsGit tree hash: 7ee5710193353ac5155669869c06103e00a988cf

@singh1203
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hello @harche, @SergeyKanzhelev and @ArangoGutierrez 👋,
I'm reaching out from the Docs team again.
Just checking in as we approach Docs Freeze on Wednesday 8th April 2026 (AoE) / Thursday 9th April 2026, 12:00 UTC.
This documentation appears to still be under review.
To meet the Docs Freeze, this PR must have a technical review as well as lgtm and approve labels applied, without any unaddressed comments or concerns from SIG Docs.
Thank you!

@nojnhuh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

nojnhuh commented Apr 2, 2026

/wg device-management

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the wg/device-management Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to WG Device Management. label Apr 2, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. language/en Issues or PRs related to English language lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. wg/device-management Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to WG Device Management.

Projects

Status: 🆕 New

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants