-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 177
[BLOG]-CNCF(LFX) Industrial EAI-benchmarking with KubeEdge-Ianvs added #752
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: RONAK <codeitronak226277@gmail.com>
|
Welcome @RONAK-AI647! It looks like this is your first PR to kubeedge/website 🎉 |
Summary of ChangesHello @RONAK-AI647, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces a significant new blog post that outlines a pioneering benchmark for embodied intelligence in industrial manufacturing. The post details how the KubeEdge-Ianvs framework can be utilized to evaluate robotic assembly of deformable electronic components, addressing critical gaps in existing research. It highlights the creation of a unique multimodal dataset and a comprehensive end-to-end evaluation infrastructure designed to accelerate the development and deployment of reliable autonomous assembly systems in real-world industrial settings. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a new blog post on EAI-benchmarking with KubeEdge-Ianvs and adds the author's details. The blog post is well-structured and informative. However, I've identified several issues that need attention before merging. There's a YAML formatting error in authors.yml that could break parsing. The blog post itself contains broken links for images and a placeholder for a video URL. Additionally, the tutorial commands use absolute paths in the root directory, which is not a recommended practice and could cause issues for users. I've provided specific comments and suggestions to address these points.
|
/hold |
7846446 to
83c131e
Compare
Signed-off-by: RONAK <codeitronak226277@gmail.com>
83c131e to
5df5c18
Compare
Signed-off-by: RONAK <codeitronak226277@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: RONAK <codeitronak226277@gmail.com>
|
@kevin-wangzefeng @Shelley-BaoYue its ready to review , please take a look !!! |
|
/unhold |
|
|
||
| #### What Makes This Project Unique: | ||
|
|
||
| This work represents the **first comprehensive benchmark** for robotic assembly of deformable electronic components—a scenario ubiquitous in modern electronics manufacturing yet completely absent from existing research infrastructure. Our contributions are unprecedented in scope: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i usually see this — from generative AI description, maybe we do not need that in here and else where?
| This work represents the **first comprehensive benchmark** for robotic assembly of deformable electronic components—a scenario ubiquitous in modern electronics manufacturing yet completely absent from existing research infrastructure. Our contributions are unprecedented in scope: | |
| This work represents the **first comprehensive benchmark** for robotic assembly of deformable electronic components, a scenario ubiquitous in modern electronics manufacturing yet completely absent from existing research infrastructure. Our contributions are unprecedented in scope: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes , I have re-polished all the points using generative AI . I will remove those dashes -if annoying
| - Familiarity with robotic manipulation concepts | ||
| - Understanding of computer vision fundamentals | ||
|
|
||
| > **Note**: This benchmark has been tested on Linux platforms. Windows users may need to adapt commands accordingly. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if that is not supported on windows, why do we put that required platform more specifically (e.g Ubuntu Noble) for user documentation? so that we can avoid complication and problems in the 1st place.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I included the Windows note because users often try to run benchmarks on Windows, and it works. Specifying "Ubuntu Noble" is too restrictive—the benchmark works on Ubuntu 18.04+, Debian, and other Linux distros, if you say I will strict the sentence for the same.
|
Any other comments sir @fujitatomoya |
Signed-off-by: RONAK <codeitronak226277@gmail.com>
Shelley-BaoYue
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
cc @MooreZheng
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Shelley-BaoYue The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
cc @hsj576 |
Blog Post
Feature
Embodied Intelligence meets KubeEdge-Ianvs: Industrial Assembly Benchmarking
This blog introduces how to enable comprehensive embodied intelligence benchmarking for industrial manufacturing using the KubeEdge-Ianvs framework.