Skip to content

Conversation

@JiriLojda
Copy link
Member

Motivation

Which issue does this fix? Fixes #issue number

If no issue exists, what is the fix or new feature? Were there any reasons to fix/implement things that are not obvious?

Checklist

  • Code follows coding conventions held in this repo
  • Automated tests have been added
  • Tests are passing
  • Docs have been updated (if applicable)
  • Temporary settings (e.g. variables used during development and testing) have been reverted to defaults

How to test

If manual testing is required, what are the steps?

@JiriLojda JiriLojda requested a review from a team as a code owner December 25, 2025 18:58
@JiriLojda JiriLojda force-pushed the fix_entity_callbacks_params branch from 60e472b to 873a67d Compare December 25, 2025 19:03
@JiriLojda JiriLojda force-pushed the fix_entity_callbacks_params branch from 6ebce8d to 4b39435 Compare December 27, 2025 14:40
@JiriLojda JiriLojda force-pushed the fix_entity_callbacks_params branch from 4b39435 to 3fdb949 Compare December 27, 2025 14:43
build:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please updat to v6 for checkoutg and check version of others actions

- run: pnpm publish --access=public --no-git-checks
if: ${{!github.event.release.prerelease}}
env:
NODE_AUTH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.NPM_API_KEY }}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please remove node_auth_token ( I tihnk its only for release) and change it to oidc

export const validateSyncModelFolder = async (folderPath: string) => {
export const validateSyncModelFolder = async (
folderPath: string,
entities: ReadonlySet<SyncEntityName>,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why is this set?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Conceptually, I have to agree with Claude that it makes sense for this to be a readonly set. Having said that, I do agree with you that it is unnecessary complication as we never have the data in this structure so I refactored the function to accept an array of entity names instead.

@JiriLojda JiriLojda merged commit 6043c93 into main Jan 2, 2026
3 checks passed
@JiriLojda JiriLojda deleted the fix_entity_callbacks_params branch January 2, 2026 17:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants