Conversation
…arams Feature/add ability to validate params
fix: Optimize state initialization in useMeteorCall
Summary of ChangesHello @kolyasya, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces version Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request is a significant update, refactoring the useMeteorCall hook to support the new Meteor.callAsync API while maintaining backward compatibility. It also introduces a comprehensive example application, which is a great addition for users. My review focuses on improving error handling robustness, code clarity in the example, and suggesting a more conventional project structure for better maintainability. I've identified a critical issue in error handling that could lead to application crashes, along with other high and medium severity suggestions to enhance the code quality.
| return console.error( | ||
| `This package only works in Meteor environment. Check https://www.meteor.com/` | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Returning console.error here will cause the application to crash when destructuring the hook's return value, as console.error does not return an iterable. This check should instead throw an error to halt execution and provide a clear message, which is a standard practice for unrecoverable errors in React hooks.
| return console.error( | |
| `This package only works in Meteor environment. Check https://www.meteor.com/` | |
| ); | |
| throw new Error( | |
| `This package only works in Meteor environment. Check https://www.meteor.com/` | |
| ); |
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (!name) { | ||
| console.error('Name is required to call Meteor method'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Calling console.error without stopping the hook's execution can lead to unpredictable behavior. The hook will continue to render, and the returned methodHandler will fail later when called without a valid method name. It's better to throw an error immediately to prevent further issues.
| console.error('Name is required to call Meteor method'); | |
| throw new Error('Name is required to call Meteor method'); |
| // methodWithResult('one', 'two', 'three'); | ||
| // methodWithResult(); | ||
| // methodWithResult({}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This file contains commented-out code. If this code is no longer needed, it should be removed to improve code clarity and maintainability. If it's for demonstration, it would be better to explain its purpose in a comment rather than leaving dangling code.
| #!/bin/bash | ||
|
|
||
| # Script to prepare the package structure before npm publish | ||
|
|
||
| # Remove existing files and directories | ||
| rm -rf ./src | ||
|
|
||
| # Create a new directory structure | ||
| mkdir ./src | ||
| cp ./example/imports/ui/react-meteor-method-hooks/* ./src |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This script copies the package source code from the example directory into src before publishing. This project structure is unconventional and can be confusing for new contributors, as the source of truth is not in the expected src directory. Consider refactoring the project to have the package source code live in src and have the example application import from there. This would make the project structure more standard and easier to maintain.
| } | ||
|
|
||
| setLoading(false); | ||
| setError('Params validation failed on method call'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The error state is being set to a plain string here, but for other errors (like from Meteor.callAsync), it's set to an error object. This inconsistency can make error handling difficult for the consumer of the hook. To ensure a consistent error structure, it would be better to set an error object that mimics Meteor's error format.
| setError('Params validation failed on method call'); | |
| setError({ reason: 'Params validation failed on method call' }); |
|
Hello @kolyasya! I've provided a summary of the pull request above. Please let me know if you have any specific questions about the changes, the review, or if there's anything else I can assist you with. You can also use |
3 participants
No description provided.