Skip to content

Conversation

@benedictgeek
Copy link

I had to modify the package to remove the reversed getter from the implementation for my use case.

I think this PR might just help others with similar use case, it is tiny but convenient.

@karan413255
Copy link
Owner

@benedictgeek thanks your change. I will check the PR in couple of days

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants