Skip to content

Conversation

@kirkbrauer
Copy link
Member

@kirkbrauer kirkbrauer commented Nov 25, 2025

Continues implementation of jumpstarter-dev/jumpstarter#606

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Export operations now include detailed status messaging for improved visibility into operation progress and outcomes.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 25, 2025

Walkthrough

A new string field status_message with OUTPUT_ONLY behavior is added to the Exporter message in the protobuf definition, enabling textual status information to be transmitted alongside existing status mechanisms.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Exporter schema expansion
proto/jumpstarter/client/v1/client.proto
Added status_message string field (field 5, OUTPUT_ONLY) to the Exporter message

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

  • Single, isolated field addition with no logic or control flow changes
  • No breaking changes to existing fields
  • Clear field numbering and protobuf conventions applied

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • mangelajo

Poem

🐰 A message for status, so clear and so bright,
The Exporter now speaks what's wrong or what's right,
Output-only wisdom, field five takes the stage,
String words of guidance, written on the page! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change in the pull request: adding a status_message field to the Exporter message in client.proto.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch add-hooks

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1a9a9e4 and 3ca0da9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • proto/jumpstarter/client/v1/client.proto (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: michalskrivanek
Repo: jumpstarter-dev/jumpstarter-protocol PR: 24
File: proto/jumpstarter/client/v1/client.proto:70-70
Timestamp: 2025-08-06T11:35:36.215Z
Learning: In the jumpstarter-protocol repository, the user michalskrivanek intentionally uses non-optional boolean fields for status indicators like the `online` field in the Exporter message, preferring to treat unset values as false rather than distinguishing between unset and explicitly false states.
📚 Learning: 2025-08-06T11:35:36.215Z
Learnt from: michalskrivanek
Repo: jumpstarter-dev/jumpstarter-protocol PR: 24
File: proto/jumpstarter/client/v1/client.proto:70-70
Timestamp: 2025-08-06T11:35:36.215Z
Learning: In the jumpstarter-protocol repository, the user michalskrivanek intentionally uses non-optional boolean fields for status indicators like the `online` field in the Exporter message, preferring to treat unset values as false rather than distinguishing between unset and explicitly false states.

Applied to files:

  • proto/jumpstarter/client/v1/client.proto
🔇 Additional comments (1)
proto/jumpstarter/client/v1/client.proto (1)

73-73: Clean addition to the Exporter message.

The new status_message field is properly configured with OUTPUT_ONLY behavior and follows the existing pattern of status-related fields. Field numbering is sequential and correct for proto3. The addition complements the structured status enum field (field 4) by providing human-readable status details.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@kirkbrauer kirkbrauer merged commit 8bbc1be into main Nov 25, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants