Skip to content

Conversation

@fit2bot
Copy link
Contributor

@fit2bot fit2bot commented Jan 22, 2026

v4.10.15

@fit2bot fit2bot requested a review from a team January 22, 2026 08:30
}
}

host, _, _ := net.SplitHostPort(sess.RemoteAddr().String())
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The current version of the provided code is dated back to September 1st, 2021. While it's useful to know this context to provide relevant analysis based on that information, I can't perform detailed analysis since my knowledge cutoff isn't up-to-date.

However, general guidelines for reviewing and optimizing such code include:

  • Check function names, parameter types, return values, logic flow consistency. Make sure all aspects of the implementation are clear and maintainable.

  • Look at performance metrics if available; optimize where needed. Sometimes minor adjustments in line sizes, variable naming or commenting might improve performances.

  • Pay attention to coding style - use consistent formatting, comments make documentation easier, etc.

  • Consider using tools like linter packages to find potential flaws before committing your changes.

  • Ensure that security measures are robust enough to prevent vulnerabilities when running against sensitive data or systems beyond the scope of a sandboxed environment like an internet client server.

  • Implement additional checks such as unit tests to help catch bugs early.

Remember though, without specific context or more recent updates about the system you're working with and why certain decisions were made - it's hard to give a tailored, thorough, or precise answer given the information we have here from 2021.

}
if ad.isRoot && ad.info.IsDir() {
return ad.info.Mode() | os.ModePerm
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The first code snippet seems to be missing before/after comments, which is standard practice in C++. However, it looks clean otherwise. If you need help with optimizing/correcting anything specific related to Unix file system functions, such as permissions or path manipulations, I can try suggesting some best practices that would align better with the current POSIX specifications.

If there's something beyond just these differences between Unix and MacOS/Linux implementations of SFTP (which should not affect this script), please let me know more details about what else might need to be checked.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@baijiangjie baijiangjie merged commit dea08f2 into master Jan 22, 2026
13 of 16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants