-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
Translate Chapter 3 (Density Functional Theory) to English #31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Co-authored-by: jochym <5993422+jochym@users.noreply.github.com>
jochym
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Address the comments
book/main.tex
Outdated
| Zaproponowane zostało nowe podejście zwane uogólnionym przybliżeniem gradientowym ({\it ang. generalized gradient approximation} - GGA), | ||
| gdzie energia wymienno-korelacyjna jest funkcjonałem gęstości elektronowej i jej gradientów \cite{Langreth83,Pardew86,Becke88}. | ||
| W ogólnej formie dla układu spolaryzowanego spinowo może być zapisana w formie | ||
| % **[REVIEW NEEDED]**: Verify technical terminology for gradient expansion and sum rules |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is OK
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review marker removed in commit 6429bdb.
book/main.tex
Outdated
| o około rząd wielkości od energii korelacji. W LDA, energia wymiany jest zaniżona średnio o $10\%$, a energia korelacji jest znacznie zawyżona, | ||
| nawet powyżej $100\%$, w porównaniu do wartości dokładnych. Ze względu na przeciwne znaki odchyleń od wartości dokładnych, błędy energii wymiany | ||
| i korelacji w przybliżeniu LDA częściowo kasują się. | ||
| % **[REVIEW NEEDED]**: Check the translation of comparison statements about energy accuracy |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The translation is fine
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review marker removed in commit 6429bdb.
book/main.tex
Outdated
| and for the helium atom it is very well reproduced. In the other cases shown in Table \ref{EXC}, it is smaller | ||
| than the exact value by a few percent. | ||
|
|
||
| % **[REVIEW NEEDED]**: Verify the explanation of LDA vs GGA performance differences |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The translation is fine
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review marker removed in commit 6429bdb.
Co-authored-by: jochym <5993422+jochym@users.noreply.github.com>
All three review markers removed per your approval in commit 6429bdb. |
Translation of Chapter 3: Density Functional Theory
💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our 2 minute survey.