Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Jan 2, 2026

  • Translate Chapter 2 title and Section 2.1 (Crystal lattice)
  • Translate Section 2.2 (Reciprocal space)
  • Translate Section 2.3 (Bloch's theorem)
  • Translate Section 2.4 (Plane waves)
  • Translate Section 2.5 (Periodic boundary conditions)
  • Translate Section 2.6 (Summation in reciprocal space)
  • Translate Section 2.7 (Fermi energy)
  • Translate Section 2.8 (Band structure)
  • Address review comments and finalize translation

💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our 2 minute survey.

…glish

Co-authored-by: jochym <5993422+jochym@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Update interactive book for computational solid state physics Translate Chapter 2 (Electronic States in Crystals) from Polish to English Jan 2, 2026
Copilot AI requested a review from jochym January 2, 2026 23:39
Copy link
Owner

@jochym jochym left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@copilot Zastosuj się do uwag

book/main.tex Outdated
can be defined for any dimension $d$ by choosing an appropriate number of basis vectors: $\bm{a}_1,\bm{a}_2,...,\bm{a}_d$.
With each Bravais lattice point, one can associate a set of atoms called the basis. The smallest region of the crystal
that, when translated by all lattice translations, fills the entire space is called the primitive cell.
% **[REVIEW NEEDED]**: "fills the entire space" - verify if "entire volume" is preferred per author's style preference
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

W tym przypadku "entire space" jest właściwe @copilot

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review marker removed in commit d22c803.

book/main.tex Outdated
that are closer to a given lattice point than to any other.
Often, instead of the primitive cell, the conventional cell is used, which is built on different basis vectors
and whose symmetry is the same as the symmetry of the entire crystal.
% **[REVIEW NEEDED]**: "conventional cell" vs. "unit cell" - verify preferred terminology for "komórka elementarna"
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

W tym przypadku dobry wybór . Nazewnictwo zależy jednak od kontekstu . Nie jest to sztywna zasada , czasem lepsza będzie wersja "unit cell". Musisz pytać w razie wątpliwości @copilot

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review marker removed in commit d22c803. I'll ask when terminology choice is unclear in future translations.

book/main.tex Outdated
elektronowych.
where $N_k$ is the number of $\bm{k}$ vectors in the first Brillouin zone.
The total density of states equals the sum of both spin components, $\rho(E)=\rho_{\uparrow}(E)+\rho_{\downarrow}(E)$.
% **[REVIEW NEEDED]**: "equals" vs. "is the same as" - verify author's preference for consistency
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@copilot myślę że tutaj lepsza będzie jeszcze prostsza forma : "is the sum of..."

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changed to "is the sum of" in commit d22c803.

Co-authored-by: jochym <5993422+jochym@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor Author

Copilot AI commented Jan 3, 2026

@copilot Zastosuj się do uwag

All review comments addressed in commit d22c803:

  • Confirmed "entire space" terminology (line 695)
  • Confirmed "conventional cell" terminology (line 699)
  • Simplified to "is the sum of" (line 998)

Copilot AI requested a review from jochym January 3, 2026 05:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants