(WIP) Generate field description rather than docstring

[devxoul]

This PR resolves #53

I couldn't find a related test case and I'm not sure whether this change could cause side effects.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and project coverage change: -0.01 ⚠️

Comparison is base (5b78fa2) 93.88% compared to head (2c74c54) 93.88%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #54      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.88%   93.88%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          56       56              
  Lines        3058     3056       -2     
==========================================
- Hits         2871     2869       -2     
  Misses        187      187              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
turms/recurse.py	87.80% <100.00%> (-0.15%)	⬇️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[jhnnsrs]

Hi there thanks for the PR :)

Tests seem to like it, however i think it would be great if this could be a bit more configurable, as some people (me for example might prefer the docstring over the description). What would you think about adding a Generator Config variable with
field_description = "docstring" | "inline" | "both" ?

[devxoul]

@jhnnsrs that would be awesome. I think I can update the PR this month.