Feature: Operation generator #2
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Owner
|
@luizkowalski Oh awesome, thanks Luiz! :) I'll review as soon I as get the chance! |
jeremysmithco
requested changes
Jul 7, 2025
Owner
jeremysmithco
left a comment
jeremysmithco
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey, this looks great Luiz! 🙌
This is minor and perhaps slightly unconventional, but I'd prefer that operation classes not have the Operation suffix (and corresponding _operation filename suffix). If you're okay with making that change, I'll get it merged and cut a new release!
Contributor
Author
|
oh yeah, because |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I noticed that there is no generator for a new operation so I added one. let me know what you think!