Add experiment class

[janfreyberg]

No description provided.

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

This PR has an average code quality of 81.14%

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity		2.25 ⭐
Method Length		49.95 ⭐
Working memory		7.55 🙂
Quality	%	81.14% ⭐	%

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines		840

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
src/superintendent/base.py	%	81.97% ⭐	%
src/superintendent/acquisition_functions/init.py	%	73.16% 🙂	%
src/superintendent/acquisition_functions/decorators.py	%	78.34% ⭐	%
src/superintendent/acquisition_functions/functions.py	%	88.29% ⭐	%
src/superintendent/experiments/init.py	%	77.33% ⭐	%

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
src/superintendent/base.py	Labeller.__init__	7 ⭐	296 ⛔	21 ⛔	33.59% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
src/superintendent/base.py	Labeller.retrain	9 🙂	206 ⛔	15 😞	41.30% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
src/superintendent/acquisition_functions/decorators.py	make_acquisition_function	13 🙂	120 😞	15 😞	46.13% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
src/superintendent/acquisition_functions/decorators.py	make_acquisition_function.decorator	10 🙂	113 🙂	15 😞	49.69% 😞	Extract out complex expressions
src/superintendent/acquisition_functions/decorators.py	_is_multioutput	4 ⭐	54 ⭐	15 😞	63.99% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Let us know what you think of it by mentioning @sourcery-ai in a comment.