This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 27, 2023. It is now read-only.
Closed
Conversation
5fd2773 to
2acd046
Compare
This was referenced Mar 9, 2023
Contributor
Author
|
No longer needed |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related to ipfs/boxo#176.
Unclear what the best way is to handle this (e.g. using a different abstraction, having a generic
Metadatafunction, usingCid(), etc.). However, the problem this solves is being able to pass around the file and directory abstractions while still knowing the root CID of each component (e.g. for listing the CID links of all items in a directory).