Skip to content

Conversation

@DikieDick
Copy link

Updates the screenshot to include the newest changes made to Waterproof.

Note that the uploaded image is of a lower resolution. If desired I can create a higher resolution one later.

@jellooo038
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good, although the higher resolution version is definitely needed!

Some remarks:

  • Remove line numbers
  • In line 41, l is used as a dummy variable, whereas later on m is used. I prefer m for readability
  • The symbol used for implication is hard to read (line 41 and 48). Can we replace this by the other bold arrow that can be used for this notation?

@DikieDick
Copy link
Author

Thanks for the remarks Jelle!

Jim also suggested using the image from the Nieuw Archief article.
I think that one also fits well.

@jellooo038
Copy link
Contributor

Good idea, that example also showcases the "Indeed ..." proof step!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants