Skip to content

SRE-671 - Fixing k6-operator workflow errors#293

Merged
jsclifford merged 1 commit intomainfrom
SRE-671-k6-operator-fixes
Feb 21, 2025
Merged

SRE-671 - Fixing k6-operator workflow errors#293
jsclifford merged 1 commit intomainfrom
SRE-671-k6-operator-fixes

Conversation

@jsclifford
Copy link
Contributor

  • Missed updating powerstate code in another job
  • Fixed needs section with approval job being renamed.

@jsclifford jsclifford force-pushed the SRE-671-k6-operator-fixes branch 3 times, most recently from f74af97 to e1dcce5 Compare February 21, 2025 20:42
@jsclifford jsclifford marked this pull request as ready for review February 21, 2025 20:42
@jsclifford jsclifford requested review from a team as code owners February 21, 2025 20:42
@jsclifford jsclifford force-pushed the SRE-671-k6-operator-fixes branch from e1dcce5 to 08d8201 Compare February 21, 2025 20:48
Copy link

@edaguilera edaguilera left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@jsclifford jsclifford merged commit ddb249d into main Feb 21, 2025
@jsclifford jsclifford deleted the SRE-671-k6-operator-fixes branch February 21, 2025 20:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants