update aca entities sha

[saipraveen18]

https://app.clickup.com/t/868ff17tt

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Updated test fixtures to include or correct applicant ages across scenarios: adjusted ages in financial assistance fixtures (55→40, 55→25) and added age_of_applicant fields in individual market (40, 25) and SSA/VLP (33) shared examples.
  • Improved realism and coverage of eligibility/validation by ensuring applicant age data is present and consistent.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Updated test data in three spec shared_example files to add or change age_of_applicant on applicant hashes for financial assistance, individual market, and SSA/VLP scenarios. No control-flow or public API signature changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Applicant age fields in spec shared examples spec/shared_examples/cv3_determined_financial_assistance_application.rb, spec/shared_examples/cv3_determined_individual_market_application.rb, spec/shared_examples/ssa_vlp_application_cv3.rb	Added/updated age_of_applicant values on applicant hashes in test fixtures. Financial Assistance: 40, 25 (updated from 55/55); Individual Market: 40, 25 (added); SSA/VLP: 33, 33 (added). No other structural edits.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• vlp applicant request #268 — Modifies applicant data in spec/shared_examples (adds/changes applicant fields), closely related to these fixture edits.

Suggested labels

cr-120+

Suggested reviewers

• saikumar9
• vkghub
• kristinmerbach

Poem

I’m a rabbit fixing specs with care,
I tuck in ages here and there.
Forty, twenty-five, and thirty-three,
Nicely placed in each fixture tree.
Hop-hop—tests ready, light as air. 🐇✨

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

• MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
• Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
• Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5c5a809 and a57beb4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• spec/shared_examples/cv3_determined_financial_assistance_application.rb (2 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• spec/shared_examples/cv3_determined_financial_assistance_application.rb

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)

• GitHub Check: build-and-upload-image
• GitHub Check: rspec

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate Docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch CU_868ff17tt

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore or @coderabbit ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

• Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)

spec/shared_examples/ssa_vlp_application_cv3.rb (4)

144-144: Confirm age value vs DOB/effective date

DOB is 1988-11-11 and assistance_year is 2021 (aptc_effective_date 2021-10-01). Age_of_applicant 33 may be off by one depending on the reference date (likely 32 as of 2021-10-01). Please verify the intended convention and adjust.

Consider deriving age from DOB and a reference date to avoid drift across fixtures.

---

336-336: Confirm age value vs DOB/effective date (second applicant)

Same concern as above: DOB 1988-11-11 with 2021 context; age 33 may not match. Please verify and align with the chosen reference date.

---

562-562: Likely incorrect age for 2025 UQHP example

In uqhp_application_params, submitted_at/effective_on are in 2025. With DOB 1988-11-11, age should be 36 as of 2025-05-30, not 33. Please correct or document the reference date used.

---

598-598: Repeat of age mismatch for second UQHP applicant

Same as Line 562: age 33 seems inconsistent with 2025 context; likely 36. Please verify and adjust.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

• MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
• Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
• Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 442ff13 and 5c5a809.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• Gemfile.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• spec/shared_examples/cv3_determined_financial_assistance_application.rb (2 hunks)
• spec/shared_examples/cv3_determined_individual_market_application.rb (2 hunks)
• spec/shared_examples/ssa_vlp_application_cv3.rb (2 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)

• GitHub Check: build-and-upload-image
• GitHub Check: docsite
• GitHub Check: rspec

🔇 Additional comments (1)

spec/shared_examples/cv3_determined_individual_market_application.rb (1)

158-158: LGTM for this applicant

Value 25 matches DOB 2000-07-10 in 2025.