Fix case of readOnlyRootFilesystem while not persisting with PVC nor using multiinstance#116
Open
zigarn wants to merge 1 commit intoibm-messaging:mainfrom
Open
Fix case of readOnlyRootFilesystem while not persisting with PVC nor using multiinstance#116zigarn wants to merge 1 commit intoibm-messaging:mainfrom
zigarn wants to merge 1 commit intoibm-messaging:mainfrom
Conversation
…using multiinstance
Author
|
Already accepted and agreed the terms of the Developer's Certificate of Origin in #115 (comment) |
Author
|
@callumpjackson, any plan to upgrade to IBM MQ container v9.4.3.1-r2 and integrate this PR (and others) on the way? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently failing because of read-only FS with this configuration as the paths
/mnt/mqm*are on the container read-only FS:This PR handle this situation by using
emptyDirvolumes like for/run&/tmp.I know this situation is not a production mode, but for development where persistence is not useful but in context where the read-only FS is mandatory, it can be configured this way.