Skip to content

Fix reindexing token pool created events when creation and active are different steps #1599

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
EnriqueL8 wants to merge 8 commits into from
Closed

Fix reindexing token pool created events when creation and active are different steps #1599

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
16e059c
Fix reindexing token pool created events when creation and active are…
EnriqueL8 Nov 20, 2024
7ec035d
Ignore if same ID for token pool creation event on re-index
EnriqueL8 Nov 20, 2024
cfa66ce
Slightly update the error message
EnriqueL8 Nov 20, 2024
276bc7b
remove changes in loading operation with token pool activation
EnriqueL8 Nov 20, 2024
5d0db28
update copyright
EnriqueL8 Nov 20, 2024
283aa70
update dockerfile postgres version
EnriqueL8 Nov 20, 2024
7d7ae2f
undo dockerfile change
EnriqueL8 Nov 20, 2024
290ea03
One more copyright missing
EnriqueL8 Nov 20, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion internal/assets/token_pool.go
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
// Copyright © 2023 Kaleido, Inc.
// Copyright © 2024 Kaleido, Inc.
//
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
//
Expand Down
7 changes: 6 additions & 1 deletion internal/definitions/handler_tokenpool.go
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
// Copyright © 2023 Kaleido, Inc.
// Copyright © 2024 Kaleido, Inc.
//
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
//
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -92,6 +92,11 @@
}
}

if existing.ID.Equals(pool.ID) {
Copy link
Contributor

@awrichar awrichar Nov 21, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm trying to understand how we got to this point with a duplicate ID. Your description indicates we are processing a TokenPoolCreated event, so we're coming in via eventManager.TokenPoolCreated() and then definitionSender.DefineTokenPool() and then here.

But in eventManager.TokenPoolCreated(), there is a check for an existing pool. Is that check failing to find the existing pool and allowing it to get down to here?

Copy link
Contributor

@awrichar awrichar Nov 21, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also worth confirming... were you running the latest release (v1.3.2) when you saw this?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@EnriqueL8 EnriqueL8 Nov 22, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, running the latest v1.3.2 release

log.L(ctx).Warnf("Received duplicate token pool creation with ID=%s, ignoring and carrying on for token connector: %s", pool.ID, pool.Connector)
break

Check warning on line 97 in internal/definitions/handler_tokenpool.go

View check run for this annotation

Codecov / codecov/patch

internal/definitions/handler_tokenpool.go#L96-L97 

Added lines #L96 - L97 were not covered by tests
}

// Any other conflict - reject
return HandlerResult{Action: core.ActionReject, CustomCorrelator: correlator}, i18n.NewError(ctx, coremsgs.MsgDefRejectedConflict, "token pool", pool.ID, existing.ID)
}
Expand Down
Loading