Skip to content

Update dependency checkstyle to v10.26.0#98

Merged
renovate[bot] merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
renovate/checkstyle-10.x
Jun 27, 2025
Merged

Update dependency checkstyle to v10.26.0#98
renovate[bot] merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
renovate/checkstyle-10.x

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jun 27, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
checkstyle (source) 10.25.1 -> 10.26.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

checkstyle/checkstyle (checkstyle)

v10.26.0

Compare Source

Checkstyle 10.26.0 - https://checkstyle.org/releasenotes.html#Release\_10.26.0

New:

#​14949 - Add Check Support for Java 21 Record Pattern : New Check PatternVariableAssignment

Bug fixes:

#​8965 - Indentation check doesn't give violation when google formatter does
#​17122 - False positive on indentation for Annotation Arrays

Other Changes:
Add data to javadoc of Check to indicate true version of module properties inherited from the abstract parent class
Preparation for Migration of Checkstyle Codebase to Java 17
PropertyCacheFileTest.testPathToCacheContainsOnlyFileName is failing
update JavadocTokenTypes.java to new format of AST print

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "after 7am and before 11am every weekday" in timezone Europe/London, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot merged commit bf6e163 into master Jun 27, 2025
2 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/checkstyle-10.x branch June 27, 2025 17:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants