Skip to content

Conversation

@phm07
Copy link
Contributor

@phm07 phm07 commented Dec 19, 2025

The go backend is no longer experimental: https://github.com/jdx/mise/releases/tag/v2025.10.11

@phm07 phm07 self-assigned this Dec 19, 2025
@phm07 phm07 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 19, 2025 16:00
@apricote
Copy link
Member

Looks like the mise version installed in ci is still from May.

@phm07
Copy link
Contributor Author

phm07 commented Dec 19, 2025

Fix was already merged: #1286 #1287
Only needs a rebase

@phm07 phm07 force-pushed the mise-remove-go-experimental branch from 89e7665 to 51dbdd4 Compare December 19, 2025 16:41
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 19, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 72.67%. Comparing base (9437efd) to head (6c2253f).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1283   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   72.67%   72.67%           
=======================================
  Files         302      302           
  Lines       10954    10954           
=======================================
  Hits         7961     7961           
  Misses       2125     2125           
  Partials      868      868           
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 51.85% <ø> (ø)
unit 67.63% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@phm07 phm07 force-pushed the mise-remove-go-experimental branch from 51dbdd4 to 6c2253f Compare December 19, 2025 16:48
@phm07 phm07 merged commit 7019ced into main Dec 19, 2025
7 checks passed
@phm07 phm07 deleted the mise-remove-go-experimental branch December 19, 2025 17:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants