Add JSON serialization and deserialization support for schemas#183
Open
iand675 wants to merge 3 commits intohaskell-works:mainfrom
Open
Add JSON serialization and deserialization support for schemas#183iand675 wants to merge 3 commits intohaskell-works:mainfrom
iand675 wants to merge 3 commits intohaskell-works:mainfrom
Conversation
iand675
force-pushed
the
json-serialization
branch
from
109a611 to
7e5dc90
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a first pass at adding support for JSON serialization / deserialization support. There was some older code for deserializing some a JSON input based on a
Schema, but newer support for deconflicting andReadSchemas made it not particularly usable. Note: I haven't tested against other language's JSON serialization output, so at best this PR's tests only really prove a degree of internal consistency.I think this addresses #159